| Author |
Message |
gege
Newbie
Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 135
|
 Topic: The politics of abortion. Posted: 24 Jun 2005 at 12:06 |
|
Could anyone of you please explain to me how abortions could cause the world to go under?
I'm not sayng its right, I just want to know whats so totaly wrong with it.
|
|
"It's better to ask and look stupid than not to ask and remain stupid." - Unknown
|
|
|
IP Logged |
|
sithlord
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Location: Hamilton ON
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 110
|
 Posted: 24 Jun 2005 at 13:41 |
|
There is a thread in the debate form about this. Basically i consider it a form of murder. It wont destroy the world and in fact it might help it since there are tooo many humans. If we can determine when a fetus is able to think, we might be able to set a time limit during which abortion is ethical. And constantines right. It does just encourage irresponsible sex to a certain extent and when a woman doesnt think, she gets a way to not have to pay for that, but a man doesnt anyway, hel have to support the child no matter what so abortion should be done away with altogether.
|
|
Its like speed 2, only with a bus, not a boat!
|
IP Logged |
|
gege
Newbie
Joined: 11 Oct 2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 135
|
 Posted: 24 Jun 2005 at 14:12 |
|
I know about the other thread but thats only everyones political view of it. In this thread I've sensed more personal feelings in the subject.
I'm grown up in a country with free abortions and yes there's a lot of irresponsible sex but most women protect themselfes either by eating pills or by just saying no to sex without condoms.
If you think that your fellow countrywomen is more irresponsible than the ones in Sweden I'd say your wrong, your religious beliefs are stronger and make them more responsible in this area than in sweden and in the USA which this thread is mostly about the religious beliefs are even stronger.
And most women that have ever met another woman who have had an abortion and talked with her about it does not consider it an option. Its a in several ways a very unpleasant thing to do for a woman.
For me its your own choise what you do with your body, not the governments!! as long as its not murder, but thats brought up in the other thread.
|
|
"It's better to ask and look stupid than not to ask and remain stupid." - Unknown
|
IP Logged |
|
progster
Groupie
Joined: 11 Mar 2002
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 698
|
 Posted: 24 Jun 2005 at 14:52 |
|
[quote:552bff3afc=\"sithlord\"]There is a thread in the debate form about this. Basically i consider it a form of murder. It wont destroy the world and in fact it might help it since there are tooo many humans. If we can determine when a fetus is able to think, we might be able to set a time limit during which abortion is ethical. And constantines right. It does just encourage irresponsible sex to a certain extent and when a woman doesnt think, she gets a way to not have to pay for that, but a man doesnt anyway, hel have to support the child no matter what so abortion should be done away with altogether.[/quote:552bff3afc]
Ok image this:
* you have a nice girlfriend and she takes the pill
* so you're like fucking her everyday, because like... she's hot :D
* Oho the pill didn't work! (that actually happens!)
* Now you're fifteen and you've got a sixteen (yeah your a lucky son of a bitch) year old pregnant (well not so lucky...) girlfriend.
In my country, she would just get an abortion... it would suck, but at least it didn't destroy both your lives.
In your country, everyone looks at you like your an idiot for having unsafe sex (\"I didn't seriously! She was on the pill and ... forget it\") and you better start working to support your child too!
Now what's better?
|
my bookmarks
I'd like to meet the man who invented sex and see what he's working on now.
|
IP Logged |
|
sithlord
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Location: Hamilton ON
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 110
|
 Posted: 25 Jun 2005 at 17:28 |
|
In my country, Canada, she could abort within 3 months i beleive. But i do want Canada to be more like the US in that respect.
Yea a woman can do what she wants with her body... um... but not her child's body. As for which is better? I think having to pay to support a child is better that killing him/her.
It would be dam hard to do... i have a pretty sweet life and my parent together make about $120,000 per year to support me and my bro. So thats like $60,000 for one person, and plenty of people dont have all the shit that i do, so lets say $30,000 per year for an adequate upbringing.
And do normal animals have sex every signle day... i think not, its all about self control. If i got a girlfriend at age 15, which means id have to get one within a month lol (im ugly, i wont find someone till at least age 20 lol), id prolly wait a few days in between, even if she was cool with doing it every day. And id use contraception myself, and lay off for awhile when she only took the pill recently. Yes it still might happen, and that would be too bad.
If she did get pregnant, until i turn 18, some would come out of my parent's salary and they would be pissed, so that takes care of the early years, then by 18 wed both be able to get jobs that pay maybe $5,000 per year if were lucky. Going to school would still be necessary so we could eventually get jobs that require graduation so we could raise enough money, so alot of that would go to paying for babysitters and stuff. And welfare here is umm $8,000 per year... and wed have a very good case for it. I dont know if they still have it but there used to be something called the family allowances act for ppl with children that forks out another $5,000 or so a year. So thats $18,000 per year each: $36,000 per year. Many 18 year olds live with their parents, so wed do that do to minimize expenses, so raising child as a teenager is possible. It just requires hard work or better yet the smarts needed to not have a kid so the issue never happens in the first place.
Were I a pregnant woman, id rather go through that hell, than never be able to say im moral again. (Btw my friend's comdom broke last year at age 14 and his girlfriend wanted to keep that baby so i DO know what im talking about!)
|
|
Its like speed 2, only with a bus, not a boat!
|
IP Logged |
|
UnaBomber
Senior Member
Joined: 02 Feb 1998
Location: Kazakhstan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1400
|
 Posted: 25 Jun 2005 at 18:34 |
sithlord: very opinionated for one so young...
Abortion is ok, and it isnt murder. Its only you prudy right wing conservative born again christians who seem to think so.
(Btw my friend's comdom broke last year at age 14 and his girlfriend wanted to keep that baby so i DO know what im talking about!)
There are reason why people are not allowed to vote till they are 18, and you are a good example of why! (dont you younguns get pissy with me, cause that remark was only directed at our entertainingly misguided sithlord 8) ) You have no idea what you are talking about, none of your sums make sence. Only a very small top percential of working people earn 120,000$/yr. Most parents wouldnt and couldnt afford to look after their grandchildren, especially when there children are only 14
So again Abortion is ok, up till a certain week, after that it could be deemed as murder. But it is way better to abort that have 14/15 year old parents (in most cases)...
And do normal animals have sex every signle day ... i think not, its all about self control.
:omfg:
Are you serious? Is this part of our arguement? Men (and you are not one yet) have a thing called 'sex drive' which is very very strong in thier late teens 20/30's. Unless you want to be the pope then most men act on this sex drive! We are not dogs or cats who only fuck when on heat, but we (humans) enjoy sex, and are the only mamals/animals who actually have sex for pleasure and not just to reproduce, like cats and dogs!
Sorry man, I dont me to always cut the legs from under you, but you dont orbit the same planet as everyone else here it seems...
EDIT: THIS HAS GONE WAY OF TOPIC AND SHOULD PROBABLY BE SPLIT INTO TWO TOPICS
|
|
"Blah Blah Blah."
--Me
|
IP Logged |
|
--=Orion=--
Admin Group
Joined: 04 Feb 2000
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 31333
|
 Posted: 25 Jun 2005 at 19:29 |
EDIT: THIS HAS GONE WAY OF TOPIC AND SHOULD PROBABLY BE SPLIT INTO TWO TOPICS
I'd agree so consider it done.
[quote:605bb91973=\"Unabomber\"]
There are reason why people are not allowed to vote till they are 18, and you are a good example of why! (dont you younguns get pissy with me, cause that remark was only directed at our entertainingly misguided sithlord Cool ) You have no idea what you are talking about, none of your sums make sence. [/QUOTE]
The reasons aren't because there uneducated or not. Lots of adults are far more uneducated than him.
The reason why people under the age of 18 should not vote is because there frontal lobes are changing and their self control, ethics and emotions get all screwed.
Don't worry, it'll be fixed :-)
[quote:605bb91973=\"sithlord\"]
But i do want Canada to be more like the US in that respect. [/QUOTE]
I don't see why any country would like the US way, where people actually murder doctors of abortion clinics. Whether or not you agree with the 3 month descision is a political opinion, but face the fact that Canada has dealt with this problem a lot better than the US has.
Also this statement contradicts a previous statement:
[quote:605bb91973=\"sithlord\"]If we can determine when a fetus is able to think, we might be able to set a time limit during which abortion is ethical.[/QUOTE]
Scientists have a established a date when the brain begins to grow. I forgot the date, but IIRC it was bigger than 3 months*. And brain growth doesn't mean brain function or the wisdom to make that decision.
*I'll look it up when I have more time.
|
IP Logged |
|
sithlord
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Location: Hamilton ON
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 110
|
 Posted: 26 Jun 2005 at 03:13 |
Scientists have a established a date when the brain begins to grow. I forgot the date, but IIRC it was bigger than 3 months*. And brain growth doesn't mean brain function or the wisdom to make that decision.
Ok well, i could grow to agree with that if there was substantial proof, that the baby ABSOLUTELY is not self aware until before that date.
Only a very small top percential of working people earn 120,000$/yr. Most parents wouldnt and couldnt afford to look after their grandchildren, especially when there children are only 14
As for $120,000 per year, thats the total between both of my parents not just one. So yes its still a minority of people that make $60,000 per year, but there are alot more ppl that make 60 grand than those who make 120 grand. Plus that raises 2 kids so it really only requires $30,000 each, a near average salary. And my parents buy me lots of shit, so to \"just get by\" as a parent, i would projec it at a yearly income of $15,000 for each parent. Teenagers woudlnt make this much likely, but theyd be able to get welfare hopefully with a left wing government and theyd still live with their parents.
Its only you prudy right wing conservative born again christians who seem to think so.
Conservatives are my mortal enemies lol. And im completely atheist... if i were to be religious, christianity would not be my choice seeing as the catholic church has killed millions upon millions of people \"in the name of god\". It would be something peaceful like hinduism or bhudism or a reformed version of something... bla im getting off topic even more than this already is.
have sex for pleasure and not just to reproduce
Ur right, i shouldnt have compared us to other mammals, but if i had a girlfriend and she had JUST TAKEN the pill, i wouldnt try to get lucky that night. It also gets my heart racing too much to get to sleep... id do it probably every second day. And even if she were on the pill id wear a condom. Yea i know it could still happen. Thats when id start working my ass off. Id like to have kids eventually anyway. Id prefer that method to be from adoption cause the world is overpopulated but whatever works, even if it just barely works.
There are reason why people are not allowed to vote till they are 18
I fully agree with that but i doubt i will change very much in 2.1 years. Ya most ppl in these dynamic years would change but i do know that im weird. 90% of ppl my age would not be good voters and would screw up the country, unless they were too lazy to vote, which statistics show, ppl between 18 and 24 even, for the most part, are. The only underage voters allowed should be those 16 and 17 yearolds in the army, because the leader in power greatly affects them.
people actually murder doctors of abortion clinics
Wow i didnt know that. I guess the Canadian way is better. What i meant was that we should outlaw it like the US, even though our government is liberal atm and hopefully it wont result in such violence.
Ever heard of the poilitical compass? Here is one below.
.............Totalitarianism..................
......................|.............................
Left Wing..___|____..Right Wing
......................|..............................
......................|.............................
................Anarchy.........................
People normally associate left wing ideologies to veer slightly towards anarchy and right wing ideologies to veer slightly towards totalitarianism. One axis has to do with taxes, goods and services and stuff, the other has to do with the strictness of laws.
So there are actually four general quadrants of a government not two. Ppl who know me may know that i have little faith in humanity since the world is so skrewed up except for us few lucky ones isolated in well off countries. Humans usually dont do the right thing of their own volition so we need systems in place involving rigid laws with as few, grey areas requiring human discression, as possible. Thats why i actually want a Left Wing Totalitarian type of government.
So in short, u have made it clear that right wing totalitarianism like that in the states, doesnt work. I already knew that; i thought it would work in settling the abortion debate; but i trust that it doesnt work in that way either. Left wing is what i like because we need to protect the Earth, and encouraging corporations to keep capitaliing sucks and yea. But anarchist views of this instil \"trust\" in ppl which we shouldnt have. So left wing totalitarianism is the way to go, and once we figure that out, im sure things will be a whole lot better and abortion will be no exception.[/quote]
|
|
Its like speed 2, only with a bus, not a boat!
|
IP Logged |
|
UnaBomber
Senior Member
Joined: 02 Feb 1998
Location: Kazakhstan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1400
|
 Posted: 26 Jun 2005 at 04:28 |
Thats why i actually want a Left Wing Totalitarian type of government
Never hear of communism, USSR/North Korea style?
The elite are very rich, the rest are hungry or in the military.
Communism does not by any streach of the imagination help
protect the earth It doesnt help anyone, the same as facism never did.
Politics and political bias is far more subtle and complex to be maped out in 2 axes.
|
|
"Blah Blah Blah."
--Me
|
IP Logged |
|
--=Orion=--
Admin Group
Joined: 04 Feb 2000
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 31333
|
 Posted: 26 Jun 2005 at 11:28 |
|
[url=http://mininova.org/get/49944]22 days the hart begins to beat[/url] [27:31-27:39]
Not a real hart just a tube which still needs to form to a 4 chamber hart. And still no spinal cord or any braincell. This explains the 21 days/3 weeks. But it says nothing about brain cells.
For a better understanding over what develops in what time:
[url=http://mininova.org/get/40614]NGC In The Womb[/url]
I only saw that one on tv, therefore I don't have any dates.
Nor do scientist have enough understanding of the brain to pinpoint the exact date at which age a baby is self aware.
Legal disclaimer:
It might be illegal in your country to download these. In most countries this is the same as taping a tv show and watching it at a later date.
Both these documentaries might be worth buying, but I couldn't find proper links to vhs/dvds.
|
IP Logged |
|
--=Orion=--
Admin Group
Joined: 04 Feb 2000
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 31333
|
 Posted: 26 Jun 2005 at 12:14 |
|
[img:4df1777a57]http://www.kheper.net/topics/newcivilization/NewPoliticalCompass.gif[/img:4df1777a57]
http://politicalcompass.org/
[img:4df1777a57]http://www.sivadonline.com/mt/soapbox/images/polycompass.gif[/img:4df1777a57]
I only did [url=http://www.self-gov.org/quiz.html]this one[/url] around the time of the democrat election. But that thread probably has been deleted since I couldn't find it in a thorough search anymore.
|
IP Logged |
|
sithlord
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Location: Hamilton ON
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 110
|
 Posted: 27 Jun 2005 at 01:35 |
Nor do scientist have enough understanding of the brain to pinpoint the exact date at which age a baby is self aware.
Well that is why i dont agree with abortion. Yes thank you for posting those.
Yes politics is more complicated than that, but it shouldnt be. In theory this stuff should work and i thought left wing totalitarianish (not necessarily communist) governments had worked before but according to that scatter plot and the obvious example of North Korea, they havnt.
That is because of corruption. True communism doesnt concentrate wealth in a select few, thats quite the opposite. I once made a system that would be relatively free of this. It would completely interfere with international trade and such, so it would have to be in a country with enough natural resources to make it completely self sufficient.
I cant remember it all, but essentially the government (being no person, just an idea really) has infinite money. All money is virtual of course and has no physical representation. Workers dont have infinite money however, because it is only given out as an insentive to work. The government can fund things all they want without giving someone too much money and there will also be no poverty. Everyone will have just enough money to be happy yet still want to work more. Most people would make the same amount of money because those with easy jobs work long hours and those with hard jobs get the most time off.
Im sure you would agree that this is a form of communism, subject to all of the flaws that have happened in the past. Thats where it intertwines with principles of facism. If the employees of the government try to take the infinite money owned by the government, well they cant because of computerized security that protects against improper allocation of funds.
Inflation will not occur because all jobs and stores will be controlled by the government. So the owner of a convenient store must register with the government so that they cannot obtain a monopoly on anything and take the social equallity away from the people. Those trying to cheat the system will be policed heavily. There will be no leader either so that no one can be distorted by power. There will only be a constitution that cannot be changed and if they were to change it anyway, ppl living there would be outraged because the original system would work perfectly.
Ok thats WAAY of topic but its my idea of what the future should be like. A left wing totalitarian government, that would have strict laws and security measures, yet a government able to make all people equal and protect the environment. (The doc i had outlined tons of advancements like satellites in heliosynchrous orbits microwaving huge amounts of solar energy to the Earth, and security cameras that can see in MRI to monitor thought to some extent).
I remember it took me a long time but it was pretty foolproof. With that kind of a government, wed have the best of both worlds... IMO that would include no abortion but basically every other feature of a left wing government plus more that no one has been daring enough to try and not become corrupt by it. When i can vote, the party for which i will vote will be one that allows abortion because currently, thats their only piece of legislation that i dont like. They are still way better than right wing, religious ignorami.
|
|
Its like speed 2, only with a bus, not a boat!
|
IP Logged |
|
UnaBomber
Senior Member
Joined: 02 Feb 1998
Location: Kazakhstan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1400
|
 Posted: 27 Jun 2005 at 06:31 |
so it would have to be in a country with enough natural resources to make it completely self sufficient.
what like russia
Ignornami... Although this word doesnt exsit, it kind of makes sence to me! sithlord = ignorant, very very very ignorant and fucking americanised liberally stupid, but please dont cross my christian no abortiion values stupid...
4 words for you
ha ha ha ha ha
yes more than 4 but anyway...
Yes politics is more complicated than that, but it shouldnt be Politics should be, the more angles and the more parties we have in our reprosentaive democratic goverment the better!
left wing totalitarianish (not necessarily communist) governments
LOL please someone help me.... left wing totalitarisansh but not communist... ehhhh???? what like
governments had worked before but according to that scatter plot and the obvious example of North Korea, they havnt.
give me an example
True communism doesnt concentrate wealth in a select
yes it does, you are totally of base...
Marcism, is what you are refering to
I cant remember it all, but essentially the government (being no person, just an idea really) has infinite money. All money is virtual of course and has no physical representation. Workers dont have infinite money however, because it is only given out as an insentive to work. The government can fund things all they want without giving someone too much money and there will also be no poverty. Everyone will have just enough money to be happy yet still want to work more. Most people would make the same amount of money because those with easy jobs work long hours and those with hard jobs get the most time off.
You cant even get DNS, however you seem to think you can grasp Marcism..
Thats where it intertwines with principles of facism. If the employees of the government try to take the infinite money owned by the government, well they cant because of computerized security that protects against improper allocation of funds.
hehe ehhh?
Inflation will not occur because all jobs and stores will be controlled by the government.
including import and export?
look, actually I was about to write a big long speak on why you were wrong, but... I have desided that you are right.... so right, and now I will be following your way of thinking.. Honestly :roll:
|
|
"Blah Blah Blah."
--Me
|
IP Logged |
|
--=Orion=--
Admin Group
Joined: 04 Feb 2000
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 31333
|
 Posted: 27 Jun 2005 at 06:36 |
Well that is why i dont agree with abortion. Yes thank you for posting those.
You have nothing to agree/disagree on before you know all the facts.
As for the communism or marcism thing, the idea might sound great but the reality is different. Looking at the history of every communistic country should show you that. And look at what China is doing...
I get a feeling I'm doing your homework here, if you want a good discussion rather than people claiming you are wrong. To get a more constructive argument, look some stuff up on the internet and come up with some arguments supported by references.
|
IP Logged |
|
sithlord
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Location: Hamilton ON
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 110
|
 Posted: 27 Jun 2005 at 15:24 |
this word doesnt exsit
FFS do you know how the prural of every word ending in \"us\" like \"ignoramus\" is supposed to be \"i\" so \"ignorami\"? Its like saying \"octopuses\" and \"referendums\". They are widely acepted but not correct.
sithlord = ignorant, very very very ignorant and fucking americanised liberally stupid, but please dont cross my christian no abortiion values stupid...
How many times have i explained that my stance against abortion has nothing to do with christianity?! The dam religion drives me nuts with its contradictory principles. I DO disagree with it because the brain of the human being, especially a baby one, is no fully understood yet.
You have nothing to agree/disagree on before you know all the facts.
And i know we dont have all the facts, but on a topic like this, i should disagree until its proven ethical, not agree until its proven unethical.
actually I was about to write a big long speak
Maybe u should make a big speech, cause that sounded like you were lacking the evidence to prove me wrong somewhat. Yes i did plenty of research and it took a long time so im not prepared to do that again atm. Obviously its far fetched, im not saying it will work, but it probably wouldve if countires werent linked as strongly as they are today.
Politics should be, the more angles and the more parties we have in our reprosentaive democratic goverment the better!
The more parties the better? That might be true but right now there isnt even one good part it seems. Maybe u should be happy that i am going to vote FOR abortion in the future. Il just encourage everyone not to excersize their right to do it. The alternative to a pro-choice government here is basically a shitty government.
But honestly, we cant just trust human beings to steer the world in the right direction by electing the right people. Unless we have a massive revolution, all fossil fuels will be used faster than they regenerate, industry will screw over the air quality, the poles will melt and we will be doomed. I for one cant trust humans to ensure that it doesnt happen. Id gladly live under a communist / marcist / esp technocratic (cause technology cant become corrupt) rule, if the result would be preventing the inevitable extinction of the human race.
give me an example
Alrgiht i will, Saddam Hussein, Yasir Arafat and the pope. None of those governments work. Iraq because the ppl are mistreated and it got invaded anyway, Palistine because its basically a bunch of terrorist attacks on Israel and the pope because he doesnt have political power and if he were to have it, im not sure his country would be that great either.
Marcism, is what you are refering to
Well doesnt COMMUNism come from COMMUNity?! The idea that everyone gets along equally and shit? It should divide the wealth equally. Its never worked in practice but if it isnt even supposed to do this in theory, then ya i guess it would be marcism, not communism to which im referring.
You cant even get DNS, however you seem to think you can grasp Marcism..
Flaming noobs is what i like to see. Thank you for getting all mad during my DNS thread cause i was talking like a retard back there. This however is more of a matter of opinion, so how about u come up with something better, rather than just saying how crappy my ideas are.
including import and export?
uhh no, thats why i said it would be in a country with enough natural resources to be self sufficient so that it wouldnt involve in trade at all. OF course inflation would occur if a government with infinite money was importing and exporting things.[/quote]
|
|
Its like speed 2, only with a bus, not a boat!
|
IP Logged |
|
UnaBomber
Senior Member
Joined: 02 Feb 1998
Location: Kazakhstan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1400
|
 Posted: 27 Jun 2005 at 17:44 |
|
actually i was wanting an example of a communistic goverment that worked! There isnt any....
Maybe you have done research, (anyone can read up on marcism) but ideaology and practise arent a mirror of each other. Go ask an east german, or a Pole, or even an Hungarian...
|
|
"Blah Blah Blah."
--Me
|
IP Logged |
|
progster
Groupie
Joined: 11 Mar 2002
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 698
|
 Posted: 27 Jun 2005 at 18:51 |
|
cuba is doing pretty wel though, but then again they aren't communist... it's a very complex ultra socialist political system which has it's roots in marxism.
Oh yeah when you ever go to cuba, don't tell them they are living in a communist system. People there are very educated when it comes to politics and they will just crush you with arguments when it comes to these kind of discussions :D (wonderfull country btw, if you have the time and money I can recommend it).
|
my bookmarks
I'd like to meet the man who invented sex and see what he's working on now.
|
IP Logged |
|
djidji
Newbie
Joined: 08 May 2000
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 361
|
 Posted: 27 Jun 2005 at 19:48 |
|
Wait guys, I think you have it all wrong! I completely agree with sithlord. As a matter of fact I cannot wait for the next presidential election to vote for him. Then he will build his left wing totalitarian empire where there is no corruption, nobody ever steals, everybody is satisfied with what they have and everybody lives happily ever after.
You’ll see he will protect out melting poles by putting a ban on use of fossil fuels and under his reign government will start a massive funding of alternative fuels research and other advanced technologies.
Also, he will protect our rivers against irresponsible corporations that dump toxic materials into our drinking water. In fact he will go after them until they close every single one of their plans. Of course, thousands of people will loose their jobs, kids will loose their health insurance because parents lost jobs and they will start dying because they have been drinking contaminated water for years.
But wait, sithlord comes to the rescue! He will fund the social plan that provides every man, woman and child with free health services and free education. Even more, he will make sure to have enough funds for every member of society never to be without basic needs and to be guaranteed a happy lifestyle. If only sithlord hadn’t spent so much money on technology research maybe then he could fund his social plan!
But wait (again)! This is a left wing totalitarian society so all that sithlord has to do is tax those who are not on his social plan a bit more (and than some!) and his programs will be fully funded! Even better, instead of heavily taxing individuals he will tax large corporations because, after all, this is a left wing party and we should all share the goods. Now if only he didn’t put all those corporations out of business by closing their plans in the first place there would be no problem!
But wait (for the third time)! The money is no object because there is an infinite amount of it! Or it grows on trees! And, to top all that, here comes Santa Claus flying on deer, carrying a magic wand that he borrowed from a good fairy next door! We are saved! Our problems are solved! All hail sithlord (and Santa and good fairy )!
(the crowd goes wild…..)
Now, the point of the story (besides me killing time at work) is to show that those who have not experienced communism should not try to defend it. Those who have not experienced reign of Saddam (or someone similar) should not defend totalitarian government. But most of all those who fiercely discuss sexual habits and their consequences should wait to get laid first! :-)
|
|
this message was created using 100% recycled electrons
|
IP Logged |
|
--=Orion=--
Admin Group
Joined: 04 Feb 2000
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 31333
|
 Posted: 27 Jun 2005 at 20:05 |
|
Cuba might be doing well now, but it's mayor source of income is tourism. Cuba also trades a lot, which is only possible because of certain consessions.
Both Cuba & China are evolving, but thats further prove that the whole idea about true communism doesn't work.
And yes I also heard a lot of good things about people who went on vacation there.
|
IP Logged |
|
UnaBomber
Senior Member
Joined: 02 Feb 1998
Location: Kazakhstan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1400
|
 Posted: 27 Jun 2005 at 21:27 |
|
hahahaha djidji that was one of the funniest post I read for a long time!
|
|
"Blah Blah Blah."
--Me
|
IP Logged |
|
Toby
Newbie
Joined: 19 Jun 2000
Location: London UK
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 785
|
 Posted: 27 Jun 2005 at 23:34 |
|
I think weakest link theory sums it up - While we have people in a communist society, you have to deal with what humans want and lust for, People long for power and they WILL find away to get it. You cannot have a form of \"money\" with a communist society, as it means that there will be people with more and people with less, Just because they are given equal doesnt mean that people will not trade the money, borrow, lend , steal e.t.c
In a communist society how are fat people gonna get laid? :P Not like they got cash to throw about.
|
|
[url=www.battlestationradio.net][img:1fc0d49f96]http://www.bsserver.net/toby/banner.jpg[/img:1fc0d49f96][/url]
|
IP Logged |
|
sithlord
Newbie
Joined: 06 Jun 2005
Location: Hamilton ON
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 110
|
 Posted: 28 Jun 2005 at 03:15 |
|
Congratz dj that was good. But seriously, if there is infinite money, then i could fund all of those programs indefinitely as long as i did not give any one person enough to get them to stop working.
Toby raises a good point too, its human nature to gain power. That would be the collapse of my ideology in some shape or form but if a country could ever successfuly start that type of government i think it would last quite awhile provided other countries didnt invade it due to its extreme ideas.
So its now clear that cuba is the closest example to this that has ever worked. I never knew how misunderstood it is, thx progster. I hope it stays the same in its next leader... how long has castro been in there... 56 years i believe. Well dont try to blame me for trying its a good idea and the greater technology becomes the better, because technology is one thing that wont try to gain power... as far as we know. If all humans could somehow be completely equal in all respects without a danger of there being too much or too litle money at any time, at least in the hands of citizens then thats a framework for a perfect world.
So id like to hear some other ideas now cause thats what humanity needs atm.. the more we cling to the ways of today's governments the longer we will spend in this downward spiral we are in. I did my best, u can use some of my ideas but make them better. Ur all obviously older and more learned than me... plz dont be so bent on proving me wrong that u run out of ideas urself.
--> Or better yet?! Lets get back to talking about the politics of abortion!!1shiftone1!
|
|
Its like speed 2, only with a bus, not a boat!
|
IP Logged |
|
UnaBomber
Senior Member
Joined: 02 Feb 1998
Location: Kazakhstan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1400
|
 Posted: 28 Jun 2005 at 04:03 |
So its now clear that cuba is the closest example to this that has ever worked.
is it? amazing how you came to this conclusion...
Anyway this thread has gone way of topic...
LOCKED
|
|
"Blah Blah Blah."
--Me
|
IP Logged |
|
--=Orion=--
Admin Group
Joined: 04 Feb 2000
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 31333
|
 Posted: 28 Jun 2005 at 07:49 |
|
It's not that amazing (he did the same thing on the abortion thread).
Those who can be convinced to take on another (political) religion will just as easily be converted to the next.
Those that can not be convinced will twist your words and arguments until it fits their own belief.
I used to think that these types of discussions where therefore pointless. But do realise that you can actually learn from them (if you want to).
You can never win a discussion everybody loses something in the end.
It's best that way. Don't think you can win on arguments either just because your run out of arguments doesn't mean you don't have a valid point.
If left wing voters vote for a left wing party they could lose everything to a right wing party. Same applies to a right wing party. And all the extremes of that political compass. So in the end you'll end up supporting a center party which isn't great (lots of concessions) but better than the alternative.
Feel free to continue this communism conversation in a new thread, since I already gained a new interest in the historie of Mexico (both by watching the thread and trying to come up with some arguments).
Sithlord come up with some arguments on how to create such an (in your opinion) ideal system. So I can point out some flaws.
|
IP Logged |
|
progster
Groupie
Joined: 11 Mar 2002
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 698
|
 Posted: 28 Jun 2005 at 10:46 |
|
[quote:c83ac77575=\"--=Orion=--\"]It's not that amazing (he did the same thing on the abortion thread).
Those who can be convinced to take on another (political) religion will just as easily be converted to the next.
Those that can not be convinced will twist your words and arguments until it fits their own belief.
I used to think that these types of discussions where therefore pointless. But do realise that you can actually learn from them (if you want to).
You can never win a discussion everybody loses something in the end.
It's best that way. Don't think you can win on arguments either just because your run out of arguments doesn't mean you don't have a valid point.
If left wing voters vote for a left wing party they could lose everything to a right wing party. Same applies to a right wing party. And all the extremes of that political compass. So in the end you'll end up supporting a center party which isn't great (lots of concessions) but better than the alternative.
Feel free to continue this communism conversation in a new thread, since I already gained a new interest in the historie of Mexico (both by watching the thread and trying to come up with some arguments).
Sithlord come up with some arguments on how to create such an (in your opinion) ideal system. So I can point out some flaws.[/quote:c83ac77575] i would also recommend reading up on the (r)evolution in venezuela that happened over the latest years :)
|
my bookmarks
I'd like to meet the man who invented sex and see what he's working on now.
|
IP Logged |
|